Placeholder in case I ever use this later.

http://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement/  Clause 12


Why this is evil:

Arbitration is often a kangaroo court, where companies win 99% of the time because the arbitrator's employment is determined by the company they are arbitrating.  This is something I would actually think hard about boycotting Stardock over.  Valve, I trust them less, and I'm uninstalling Steam over this.

 

I'll probably re-install at some point, but there are enough alternatives to Steam out there still that I can get by for some time.

 

This is why Stardock needs to stay away from mandatory Steamworks.   

 

 


Comments (Page 5)
5 PagesFirst 3 4 5 
on Aug 14, 2012

Krazikarl
Pretty much every EULA ever has this clause.  At some point you are just raging against the entire software game industry.

 

I agree with Krazikarl on this one. I know you are upset right now, But you will probably realise later that is nothing you can do about it and you will comply with this ... sorry.

jocuri

on Aug 14, 2012

Im not sure what the big deal is so far all the negative posts ive read are based on hypothetical what ifs. So heres some reality, video game producers can sell there product for cheaper if they sell it online because they dont have to worry about packaging, that also means they can release it sooner as packaging is a lengthy process. As well a product can be released somewhat unfinished so earlier as they can just quick patch it on release day before it goes on sale.

It has already been proven that PC video games are a dead retail market thanks to anti-pirating measures being useless. Goto any gamestop, EB games or well anywhere that sells PC games and youll notice it getting smaller. The gamestop closest to my place doesnt even carry PC games anymore other than a few MMO's like world of warcraft because as the manager even told me there just not selling and he cant accept returns so there too much of a hassle.

As for steams policys ive personally had nothing but fantastic experiences with the steam reps and so has alot of people i know. One quick example my cousin accidentally bought the trinity pack for Sins thinking it was the one he needed to play with me as it had all the expansions rather than rebellion which he figured must not be what he needed. He emailed steam telling him he made the mistake and they had him buy rebellion and within a couple days had refunded what he paid for trinity. Steam could have let him hang out to dry on that one and do nothing but they were fantastic with him.

Id be amazed if online purchasing isnt going to become the only way to buy video games, I personally dont know anyone who goes to stores to buy anything but a collectors edition of WOW these days and i personally wont buy a game i cant download online as im terrible about keeping track of my CD's and boxes and just end up throwing them out within a year cause ive garbaged them. Now thanks to steam which i buy almost all my games from im more likely to go back and play an old game because its just a simple reinstall and im good to go.

As for the EULA clauses in steam youll find the same thing or something similar everywhere, im pretty sure if you went through origins EULA youd find something similar or at least something just as offensive but in the end the company does also have to protect itself and i understand that and as much as some games require steam to play you dont necessarily have to play steam in online mode which does allow you to bypass any issues. As for online multiplayer requiring steam it doesnt, me and my cousin live in different citys and dont even play sins together through the ironclad servers so theres many ways around having to use a companys build in online services if you feel the need.

on Aug 14, 2012

StevenAus
I want an alternative to Steam because it could easily go bad for consumers very quickly.  And any game (particularly primary single player) that is reliant on a web-site service to be played at all is at the mercy of whether that web-site continues to operate in the same way or is sold to less "discerning" owners.

 

This is a legitimate worry.  Everyone "goes evil" eventually if they get big enough.   I wouldn't even trust Brad if Stardock had Valve's market share.

 

Sure if may be theoretical now, but it won't be some day, and I'd want to be prepared for that day.

 

 

on Aug 14, 2012

Heavenfall


But then I am not upset because these terms clearly do not apply to me. This sort of arbitration cannot be forced on consumers in Sweden where we have many non-negotiable laws to protect the consumers when the business fails to deliver.
 

 

And if Steam don't like the laws in any particular country they can always "Not available in your region"

Ironic that consumers talk about boycotting Steam when Steam can boycott entire countries!!

People should learn to accept that Steam have and or are close to having absolute power over their games. Why do we need checks and balances of power, Steam are good guys, and I'm sure they always will be, trust them!

on Aug 14, 2012

Why do people think there is only Steam?  I hate how Steam works.

I much prefer how Impulse used to work (or stardock central before that) with buy, download, unlock - go.  Most other digitial distributors work the same way, like direct2drive or amazon's digital.  No clue if GS is doing the same now.  Other outlets do sales and deals too.

I was kind of bummed when Stardock got rid of Impulse.  That was my prefered way to get games.  It took care of the patching stuff for you too which is convenient but it didn't completely hook into and affect your gaming.  You ran it when you wanted to run it.

Basically I just want a good digital distributor.  I don't give a flying monkey poo about achievement or any social hooks into games as Steam does them.  I actually don't want my games tied in to such things, I want them to stand alone from the distributor.

Steam is like MS...controlling so much of the market that you get to a "oh well, may as well just use/buy it on steam and put up with it's BS" state.

Given a choice, I'll buy games directly from the developer.  Beyond that, I usually just go with whatever digital source is the least expensive, and a great deal of the time, that does end up being Steam.  That or the game is steamworks bound and you're stuck with Steam no matter what - not much point in buying a game from elsewhere if you're just going to get a steam key and have to use steam anyways.

 

 In regards to the OP...I can think of reasons to dislike Steam but I can't see how this arbitration thing is even remotely relevant.  I'm not sure I could name a single legal issue with a game that I care about.  Maybe some parents spazzing out over violence or some such BS.  The idea of suing over a game is kind of laughable.

on Aug 15, 2012

what if Steam bricked your account of dozens of games under false pretenses, and you couldn't get it resolved because they wouldn't believe you.

This has happened before at least once.  You'd be out of stuff you've spent around $1,000 for.  That's something I'd want to sue over.

 

While I don't tihnk current Valve would do anything too bad, it's future Valve I'm worried about, not current Valve.  When you buy from Steam, Valve has a lot of power other whether you can use your game or not.

 

 

 

on Aug 15, 2012

Alstein
what if Steam bricked your account of dozens of games under false pretenses, and you couldn't get it resolved because they wouldn't believe you.

This has happened before at least once.  You'd be out of stuff you've spent around $1,000 for.  That's something I'd want to sue over.

 

While I don't tihnk current Valve would do anything too bad, it's future Valve I'm worried about, not current Valve.  When you buy from Steam, Valve has a lot of power other whether you can use your game or not.

You can still take them to small claims court or arbitration for that 1000$.

this change of SSA only take away option of class action lawsuits.

Also unless your clain is demed to be frivolous by small claims court / arbitration, Valve will pay your expenses up to 10 000$.

on Aug 16, 2012

Rebell44



Quoting Alstein,
reply 67
what if Steam bricked your account of dozens of games under false pretenses, and you couldn't get it resolved because they wouldn't believe you.

This has happened before at least once.  You'd be out of stuff you've spent around $1,000 for.  That's something I'd want to sue over.

 

While I don't tihnk current Valve would do anything too bad, it's future Valve I'm worried about, not current Valve.  When you buy from Steam, Valve has a lot of power other whether you can use your game or not.




You can still take them to small claims court or arbitration for that 1000$.

this change of SSA only take away option of class action lawsuits.

Also unless your clain is demed to be frivolous by small claims court / arbitration, Valve will pay your expenses up to 10 000$.

I would say 'buyer beware'.

If you know that your account can be bricked and you'd lose access to all your games as a consequence, I recommend not spending that money on their site in the first place. If everyone doesn't spend money on their site because of that reason....they'll change there policy....or go bankrupt.

 

on Aug 17, 2012

GFireflyE
Quoting Rebell44, reply 68


Quoting Alstein,
reply 67
what if Steam bricked your account of dozens of games under false pretenses, and you couldn't get it resolved because they wouldn't believe you.

This has happened before at least once.  You'd be out of stuff you've spent around $1,000 for.  That's something I'd want to sue over.

 

While I don't tihnk current Valve would do anything too bad, it's future Valve I'm worried about, not current Valve.  When you buy from Steam, Valve has a lot of power other whether you can use your game or not.




You can still take them to small claims court or arbitration for that 1000$.

this change of SSA only take away option of class action lawsuits.

Also unless your clain is demed to be frivolous by small claims court / arbitration, Valve will pay your expenses up to 10 000$.


I would say 'buyer beware'.

If you know that your account can be bricked and you'd lose access to all your games as a consequence, I recommend not spending that money on their site in the first place. If everyone doesn't spend money on their site because of that reason....they'll change there policy....or go bankrupt.

 

And I say "I dont care" because in this country we dont have class action lawsuits anyway, so this didnt change anything for me.

on Aug 17, 2012

From now on, I just won't do business  with the Steam store.  I assume any issues with Steam will revolve in the end around payment issues, so  I'll just buy things outside of Steam from now on, unless absolutely necessary.

 

If I buy any game that requires Steamworks, it will be from another site such as Gamersgate.

5 PagesFirst 3 4 5